Proceeding contribution from Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 24 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill [HL].

Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill [HL]

My Lords, before my noble friend sits down, I hope he will recognise—perhaps I misunderstood the precise form of words that he used—that it is not simply a question of consistency between the clauses in respect of vulnerable adults and children. The very strong argument has been made that certain forms of pornography—not only child pornography—are relevant in respect of children. It is not only saying that there ought to be consistency; it is saying that there is a strong case for a wider definition.

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 682 c834
Session: 2005-06
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords chamber
Subjects: Complaints Disability Children Disclosure of information Codes of practice Abuse Appeals Damages Age Conduct Employment Families Exemptions Internet Home care services Offenders NHS Qualifications Protection Membership Mental capacity Pornography Monitoring Staff Vetting Vulnerable adults Young people Sexual offences Independent Safeguarding Authority
Legislation: Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill [HL]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools