Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 June 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on European Council: June 2006.


European Council: June 2006

My Lords, we must all have been struck by the contrast between the contributions made by the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde, and the noble Lord, Lord McNally. That is perhaps the answer to those airily talking of the faint possibility of a Liberal Democrat-Conservative pact after some future general election. It is fair to say that the consensus is that this was effectively a non-event. Such a bland document will hardly merit a footnote in the history book. For example, nothing of any provocation was said. Certainly, there was no mention in the paragraph on Turkey that it is currently barring access to its ports by a member country of the Union—namely, Cyprus. It is as if the communiqué was seeking to avoid any form of controversy, though I do not blame the Austrian presidency for that. I want briefly to raise what the Prime Minister said about a new set of rules being needed for a union when it reaches 27. Is it the Government’s view that this new set of rules will be just technical, on new weighting on voting in the European Parliament, for example, or new weighting in the Council? Or, is it something of greater significance? The answer may give us some pointer as to whether that new package will merit a future referendum.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c549 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Asylum Climate change Africa Immigration controls Undocumented migrants EU enlargement EU internal trade Iraq European Constitution Treaty EU action Regulation Service industries Balkans European Commission European Council Iran Middle East Lebanon EU energy policy Timor-Leste
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk