Proceeding contribution from Tim Loughton (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 20 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].
Children and Adoption Bill [Lords]
I am saddened but not entirely surprised to hear that the hon. Lady has problems with the phrase ““legal presumption””. Will she explain why 50 of her colleagues have signed early-day motion 128, which refers specifically to the need to have a ““legal presumption of contact””? Are they misguided, or not on message? Will they surprise her with how they vote if the new clause is pressed to a Division?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 447 c1228
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Adoption Abuse CAFCASS Arbitration Contact orders Absent parents Families Domestic abuse Human trafficking Divorce Intercountry adoption Family law Grandparents Family proceedings Parents Parental responsibility Separation Risk assessment
- Legislation
- Children and Adoption Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 00:48:46 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331345
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331345
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331345