Proceeding contribution from Tim Loughton (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 20 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].
Children and Adoption Bill [Lords]
A prescriptive solution is suggested that would victimise the child most of all—children might want to have a say; they might not want to stay at a certain time with parent A or parent B—and would not be in the interests of the parent or the child and could result in more frustration and more court action when the whole thing falls apart. That is not a solution. I really do get exasperated with the Liberal Democrats. If they fail to follow us into the Division Lobby in support of new clause 4 this evening, having signed up to early-day motion 128 and supposedly supporting that very same principle, let it be put on the record and known around the country that they are prepared to say one thing to their constituents and not to have the courage of those convictions when and where it matters.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 447 c1242
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Adoption Abuse CAFCASS Arbitration Contact orders Absent parents Families Domestic abuse Human trafficking Divorce Intercountry adoption Family law Grandparents Family proceedings Parents Parental responsibility Separation Risk assessment
- Legislation
- Children and Adoption Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 17:04:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331372
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331372
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331372