Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Paice (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 29 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Commons Bill (HL).


Commons Bill [Lords]

My hon. Friend is right. Our debates in Committee and on Report have inevitably dwelt on grazing rights on commons, but there are many other rights. If, for example, everybody had rights of turbary to cut peat, a whole common could be destroyed by householders digging. The situation is unfair for graziers, because in theory they must individually approach all the house owners to lease back their unused grazing rights that would otherwise revert to them automatically by the operation of the common law extinguishment. That is not in the interests of the commons or of the normal users of the rights of common. The Minister needs to reflect on the matter. I hope that he will accept the amendment, but if he is not minded to do so, will he think through what can be done by regulation to deal with the situation that I have described?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
448 c423 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Animal welfare Applications Agriculture Conservation Construction Common land Housing Exemptions Land use Grazing land Motor vehicles Planning permission Payments Livestock Management Property National Trust Registration Safety Sports Rights of way Repairs and maintenance Walls and fences Commons councils Natural England Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk