Proceeding contribution from Patrick Mercer (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 20 July 2006. It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.
Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism
The hon. Gentleman is right, of course. Many of the questions that I have asked today may well be covered by the Minister in an explanation making that precise point. Certainly, I am criticising, but many of the other points that I am making are points of information that the whole House, as evidenced by the interventions, would be interested to know. Lastly, if we proscribe organisations, it is all very well talking and generating hot air, but what is done about asset seizure? There must be delivery, not just talk. There is no point in Government anti-terrorism strategies that are torn apart by the Government’s own audit organisations. I welcome what the Government have done today. I ask the Minister for some thoughtful—as I know they will be—and trenchant replies to the questions that the Opposition have asked.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 449 c498
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Appeals Assets National security Proscribed organisations Terrorism Teyrebaz Azadiye Kurdistan Saved Sect Baluchistan Liberation Army al Ghurabaa Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2006
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:13:42 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_339818
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_339818
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_339818