Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Heath (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 20 July 2006. It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.


Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism

The Minister is right to take that view. I am not acting as an advocate for the organisation, I am simply asking for the matter to be considered. Hizb ut-Tahrir clearly holds views that many of us find abhorrent. I am especially worried about the anti-Semitism that the organisation expounds, which should be subject to legal sanction. However, whether it is a matter for proscription is a different question. The organisation is avowedly against the violent expression of its views. I am not in possession of intelligence material that would tell me whether that is true, but I know that it states that it is against violent and terrorist activities. We must be careful not to assume, simply because we do not like—and may abhor—an organisation, that we, as a state, should stop it being able to undertake its functions in this country. We should always, when possible, use the normal criminal law to ensure that people are charged with proper offences in court and that, if they are found guilty, they pay the appropriate penalty.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
449 c503 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Appeals Assets National security Proscribed organisations Terrorism Teyrebaz Azadiye Kurdistan Saved Sect Baluchistan Liberation Army al Ghurabaa Statutory instruments
Legislation
Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk