Proceeding contribution from Lord Mayhew of Twysden (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 July 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
I am very grateful to the noble Lord for dealing with the points which I raised about the words ““lawful”” and ““reasonable””, but will he look at that again before Report? ““Lawful”” is not defined in the sense that he described. Without a specific definition, in a very narrow sense, of ““lawful excuse”” along the lines that the Minister has outlined, many people would suppose that if there were a ““reasonable excuse””, it would also be a ““lawful excuse””. For my part, I hope that any court martial dealing with any charge under Clause 1 would always feel it necessary to look at all the circumstances and that that would be so whether the charge was ““reasonable excuse”” or merely ““lawful excuse””. I hope that this might be looked at again because it is a little more difficult than it seems.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 684 c1597
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Disclosure of information Discipline Crime Armed forces Armed conflict Deployment Courts martial Civilians Desertion International law Officers Terrorism Theft Civil disorder
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:21:33 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340658
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340658
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340658