Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Armed Forces Bill.


Armed Forces Bill

moved Amendment No. 44: Page 10, line 1, after ““abusive,”” insert ““harassing,”” The noble Lord said: I shall speak also to Amendments Nos. 45 to 48. The purpose of these amendments is to make harassment of one member of the Armed Forces by another a specific and recognised offence. It follows from both the Deepcut report and the agreement recently made and published, with extensive supporting evidence, between the Armed Forces and the Equal Opportunities Commission. Harassment is easier to recognise than define, and is often more evident from the point of view of the victim than that of the perpetrator. AmendmentNo. 46 therefore includes a perception dimension: "““may be thought to be””." It also provides for the minor sentence of a service corrective order to address repetition. The whole thrust of the outcome of the EOC report is the need to stop the offence and to prevent repetition. Amendment No. 45, to substitute ““or”” for ““and””, makes it clear that this offence can be committed without it being likely to cause a disturbance. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
685 c271 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disciplinary proceedings Discipline Crime Alcoholic drinks Courts Armed forces Arrests Conduct Deployment Aircraft Courts martial Civilians Certification Defence equipment Evidence Eligibility Jurisdiction Drugs Maladministration Misconduct Powers Membership Prosecutions Misuse Public opinion Officers Low flying Young people Trials Rules of procedure Rules of engagement
Legislation
Armed Forces Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk