Proceeding contribution from Lord Garden (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
I am grateful to the Minister for going through all those amendments. I apologise for not having spoken to Amendment No. 84, but he described the rationale for it—to clarify the situation—probably better than I could have done. We were trying to be helpful with the two amendments that act as clarification without changing the meaning. If the Government want to stay with their own language, however, we will not fight that terribly hard. On Amendment No. 78, I shall look at the Minister’s remarks in Hansard, because I could not work out what the maximum time was if special circumstances pertained. If he tells me that it is sufficiently constrained—I am sure that it is—we can look and see how it is constrained and decide how we come back on that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 685 c308-9
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Discipline Crime Alcoholic drinks Courts Armed forces Arrests Conduct Deployment Aircraft Courts martial Civilians Certification Defence equipment Evidence Eligibility Jurisdiction Drugs Maladministration Misconduct Powers Membership Prosecutions Misuse Public opinion Officers Low flying Young people Trials Rules of procedure Rules of engagement
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-15 10:41:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350738
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350738
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350738