Proceeding contribution from Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
I understood the noble and learned Lord to say that under the present arrangements where there is dual jurisdiction it is left to the chief of police to decide whether to takethe matter on a civil basis or whether to refer it to the military authorities for a court martial. Those are the circumstances that I am thinking about. Let us suppose that the chief of police says, ““This murder charge, although it was committed in the United Kingdom, involves a victim who was a serviceman and therefore it should be by court martial””. Will the potential defendant have the opportunity of making representations to the Attorney-General that it should be a civil trial?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 685 c322
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Discipline Crime Alcoholic drinks Courts Armed forces Arrests Conduct Deployment Aircraft Courts martial Civilians Certification Defence equipment Evidence Eligibility Jurisdiction Drugs Maladministration Misconduct Powers Membership Prosecutions Misuse Public opinion Officers Low flying Young people Trials Rules of procedure Rules of engagement
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-15 10:41:35 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350761
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350761
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350761