Proceeding contribution from Paul Farrelly (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Companies Bill (HL).
Companies Bill [Lords]
We have been round the houses on this in our six or seven weeks in Committee. I understand that the hon. Gentleman is interested in the matter as a constituency issue, principally because of Huntingdon Life Sciences. Does he agree that he is perhaps not the right person to front this debate—maybe the hon. Member for Putney (Justine Greening) should be doing so—because he is in danger of confusing a constituency problem about which he is rightly worried with measures that would have a broad-ranging effect on companies legislation affecting business as a whole, to which I hope to refer later?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c926
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disclosure of information Animal welfare Accountability Company law Community development Companies Directors Business Annual reports Liability Donors Expenditure Exemptions Harassment Ethics Journalism Personal records Membership Political parties Public companies Loans Staff Meetings Private companies Lobbying Registration Trade unions Voting rights Shareholders Huntingdon Life Sciences Business plans
- Legislation
- Companies Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:46:23 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353155
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353155
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353155