Proceeding contribution from Paul Farrelly (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Companies Bill (HL).
Companies Bill [Lords]
I was going to raise exactly the same point that the right hon. and learned Member for Sleaford and North Hykeham (Mr. Hogg) made so well. The hon. Member for Huntingdon (Mr. Djanogly) is speaking rather more widely than to just new clauses 16 and 17 because he is addressing amendment No. 383. That amendment would make the new clauses redundant because it would confer on any shareholder the right to remove his name from the share register that is made publicly available.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c927-8
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disclosure of information Animal welfare Accountability Company law Community development Companies Directors Business Annual reports Liability Donors Expenditure Exemptions Harassment Ethics Journalism Personal records Membership Political parties Public companies Loans Staff Meetings Private companies Lobbying Registration Trade unions Voting rights Shareholders Huntingdon Life Sciences Business plans
- Legislation
- Companies Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:46:32 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353159
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353159
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353159