Proceeding contribution from David Winnick (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 2 November 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Immigration Control.
Immigration Control
I am sure that my hon. Friend, who has studied those matters very well, will have seen paragraph 479 of our report, in which we discuss the pros and cons of an amnesty. I think we unanimously agreed to the paragraph. As expected, my hon. Friend has put forward powerful arguments, but is there not the danger that an amnesty would encourage illegal immigration and, despite the advantages, reward people who have broken our laws? In many instances, they have come to this country not because they are fleeing persecution—long may our country retain its reputation for providing asylum—they have come deliberately to break the law. In order to gain work, their actions are understandable, but they have still broken the law. Should they be rewarded?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 451 c157-8WH
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Borders Employment Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Home Office Staff Overcrowding Training Visas Immigration and Nationality Directorate
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:38:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357980
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357980
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357980