Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 28 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Investment Exchanges and Clearing Houses Bill.


Investment Exchanges and Clearing Houses Bill

I am pleased to follow the hon. Member for South-West Hertfordshire (Mr. Gauke), who has taken up some of the issues that I wanted to discuss. The crux of the Bill is in clause 1. The rest is procedural, which we will come to. It is important to get the procedure right, but the principle and foundation of the Bill is in clause 1. We must be careful about the apparent love-in on ““low regulatory regime””. As an individual—I expect most hon. Members would feel the same—I would not invest in the stock exchange in Burma because that is a dodgy regime in a dodgy country. As protection there for me as an investor, whether as an individual or through some mythical company I might own, or as a buyer of the Burmese stock exchange if ever it were for sale, I would not want too little regulation because I could lose my shirt.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
453 c1036 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Accountability Bureaucracy Jurisdiction Investment Financial Services Authority Financial markets Ownership Powers Standards Regulation Stocks and shares Rules of procedure Takeovers USA Trade competitiveness London Stock Exchange Recognised clearing houses Recognised investment exchanges
Legislation
Investment Exchanges and Clearing Houses Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk