Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill
That is exactly what I wanted to emphasise. My suggestion has been ruled out by my noble friend. Am I not right in saying that we are not considering any party advantage with regard to this matter? Would it not therefore be sensible to consider the debate and what has been said, rather than rule out the opinions that have been aired?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 688 c203GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Contracts Breach of contract Children in care Detainees Death Companies Directors Crown immunity Custodial treatment Corporate manslaughter Inspections Liability Health and safety Exemptions Government departments Mental illness Prosecutions Prisoners Prisons Management Public bodies Staff Negligence Safety Suicide
- Legislation
- Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill 2005-06 to 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:48:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_369241
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_369241
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_369241