Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Nick Raynsford (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 15 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill.

Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for giving way. He rightly highlighted local authorities’ variable implementation of section 106, but will he recognise that under the Government’s proposals, a continued—albeit reduced—role will still be there for section 106? Does he also agree that a key priority must be to ensure a greater spread of expertise among local authorities, to make sure that all come up to the standards of the best in delivering and negotiating section 106 agreements?

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
455 c564 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Community development Administration Costs Housing Land ICT Investment Infrastructure Government departments Land use Local government Northern Ireland Planning Public expenditure Property development Valuation Taxation Tax yields Revenue and Customs Department for Communities and Local Government Planning gain supplement
Legislation
Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk