Proceeding contribution from Mark Francois (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 20 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill.
Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill
I agree with my hon. Friend. I return the compliment by saying that he has long been recognised as a Rottweiler on behalf of his constituents. Long may that continue. He is right in that at least part of the money in England will not go back to the relevant locality. It could even go to a different region. However, in Scotland, to which the new clause technically relates, there is no guarantee that any of the money will go back to the locality. For some Scottish constituencies, the position will be even worse.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 457 c158
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Capital gains tax Housing Land ICT Infrastructure Government departments Local government Northern Ireland Planning permission Planning Public expenditure Property development Scotland Valuation Taxation Tax rates and bands Revenue and Customs Department for Communities and Local Government Planning gain supplement
- Legislation
- Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:17:20 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_378158
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_378158
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_378158