Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mark Field (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 20 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill.


Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill

If the idea is to ensure that windfall gains to developers are put into place, does the hon. Gentleman accept that it is much more desirable to do that over a period of time through a rate than on a one-off basis? His concerns go to the heart of the matter, as there must be a sense of transparency, which can only be at the most local level. In Edinburgh, as he knows, and in central London, as I know, there is often a desire for section 106 or section 75 expenditure to be dealt with on a ward-by-ward basis, let alone within a particular local authority. What are his views on that matter?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
457 c164 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Capital gains tax Housing Land ICT Infrastructure Government departments Local government Northern Ireland Planning permission Planning Public expenditure Property development Scotland Valuation Taxation Tax rates and bands Revenue and Customs Department for Communities and Local Government Planning gain supplement
Legislation
Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk