Proceeding contribution from John Healey (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 20 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill.
Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill
My hon. Friend would probably accept that we as a Government generally have an open mind. I can give him the assurance, as I have tried to do already, that the matters about which he is concerned will be discussed, should we introduce any substantive legislation to follow a decision to introduce a planning-gain supplement. However, because of the devolved nature of the planning responsibilities in Scotland as part of the devolution settlement, we do not wish to dictate, and I am sure he is not arguing for the Government in Westminster to dictate, to Scotland how it should use the proceeds of any planning-gain supplement to support infrastructure that could help with development.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 457 c175
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Capital gains tax Housing Land ICT Infrastructure Government departments Local government Northern Ireland Planning permission Planning Public expenditure Property development Scotland Valuation Taxation Tax rates and bands Revenue and Customs Department for Communities and Local Government Planning gain supplement
- Legislation
- Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:17:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_378217
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_378217
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_378217