Proceeding contribution from Charlotte Atkins (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 12 March 2007. It occurred during Estimates day on NHS Deficits.
NHS Deficits
As a Unison member and someone who used to write evidence for the pay review body, I would not encourage nurses to work an hour unpaid. Nurses need to ensure that they are not too tired to do the job, and they already face enough pressure not only in the workplace, but, because many of them are women, family pressure and other extra responsibilities. Given that we have an expert pay review body, it should deliver the pay award and the Government should accept it in full. I appreciate that ““Agenda for Change”” has delivered fantastic opportunities for nurses in terms not only of pay, but of promotion prospects and of the chance to work in different areas. The whole role of nurses has vastly expanded, which has been encouraged by ““Agenda for Change””. The addition of 85,000 nurses to the NHS since 1997 has had a huge impact on patient care. From talking to my constituents, I know how much they value the work of nurses not only in the hospital but in the community. I certainly want to see the pay award honoured in full, and I hope that this will be the last time that it is staged. Lastly, I want to discuss training, on which, as the hon. Member for Romsey (Sandra Gidley) has said, I have questioned the Secretary of State. I feel very strongly about taking money out of the training budget, which is the seed corn of the NHS. That is not acceptable. It may be an easy option to raid the training budget, but it will have an adverse effect on staff morale, and in particular, on development. Given that a major reason for the deficits is a lack of management expertise at all sorts of levels within the NHS, it is vital that we spend more on training, not less. I asked the Secretary of State whether she would ring-fence the training budget. She did not want to do so, but I suggested that it should be controlled by a body such as the Higher Education Funding Council, which would prevent the strategic health authorities from raiding it. I would certainly welcome a more robust regime, and we must not allow the easy option of raiding training budgets to be used again. We now have a far more transparent system of NHS finances, but I still think that we lack sufficient management expertise in some areas. There appears to be a huge variation in quality, and we must find some way to ensure that the best-quality managers bring on the rest. From the evidence that we took in the Health Committee, it is clear that some managers are definitely getting it right and that others are definitely getting it wrong; unfortunately, north Staffordshire was one of the areas where management got it wrong. The situation needs to be urgently addressed, and if we do not address it, I fear that we will return to where we were a couple of years ago.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 458 c57-8
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Staff Audit Health services Finance Expenditure Health authorities NHS Recruitment Public expenditure Private finance initiative Primary care trusts Redundancy Department of Health Health Committee
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-11-24 10:43:33 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_384220
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_384220
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_384220