Proceeding contribution from Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Broads Authority Bill (By Order).
Broads Authority Bill (By Order)
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for that intervention and the reassurance, on the record, that the legal agreement is legally binding and is genuinely a legal agreement. That is quite important. I have heard it said before that it is a legal agreement, but as a lawyer myself, although I have to confess that my practising certificate has lapsed—[Interruption.] I am not a practising lawyer. As a lawyer myself, I am afraid that I do not yet understand the basis on which the agreement is a legal agreement. I do not understand the status of it as a legal agreement that can be relied on in court. I fully accept what the hon. Gentleman says—nobody wants these matters to go to court—but one has to have a legal agreement to reassure people and to guarantee the rights of people who are concerned about potentially excessive powers.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 459 c993-4
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Boats Boating Finance Land Insurance Inland waterways Floods Navigation Nature conservation Parish and town councils Norfolk National parks Safety Rivers Suffolk Dredging Broads Authority Norfolk and Suffolk Broads
- Legislation
- Broads Authority Bill 2006-07 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:21:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_392596
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_392596
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_392596