Proceeding contribution from Robert Neill (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 16 May 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Housing.
Housing
Is not the downside of that the real risk that requiring an EPC—which is a good idea, and that has always been the view of Conservative Members—up front adds to the seller’s risk of abortive costs? Those costs are likely to be passed on to the buyer, so it is not as simple as the right hon. Gentleman makes out.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 460 c653
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Costs Climate change Competition Housing Inspections Environment protection Energy Documents Grants Fuels EU action Home information packs Judicial review Gazumping Local government Pilot schemes Property transfer Loans Staff Valuation VAT Surveying Housing market First time buyers Carbon emissions Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Energy performance certificates
- Legislation
- Home Information Pack Regulations 2007
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:32:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397203
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397203
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397203