Proceeding contribution from Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 June 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
I support the amendment. During my Second Reading speech, I drew attention to the importance of the inflation rate and I asked the Minister a few questions, which he did not really address in his summing up. It is clearly important that earnings rather than prices are the basis on which the changes are to take place. I, too, had a letter from David Yeandle, and I agree with the points that he made. I hope that a little more information on these points will come from the Minister because whatever the rate of inflation—and we are a bit worried about it at the moment—it will clearly make a huge difference to whatever decision we make about any aspect of pensions.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 692 c944
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Children Child benefit Carers Age Women Eligibility Earnings rules Guaranteed minimum pensions Grandparents Pension credit Pensioners Personal savings Pay Pensions National insurance contributions Means-tested benefits Pension rights Overseas residence State retirement pensions Young people Take-up Retirement Voluntary contributions State second pension Home responsibilities protection
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:32:24 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400382
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400382
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400382