Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Monday, 4 June 2007, in the House of Lords.
Pensions Bill
Pensions Bill. Lords Committee stage first day. Clauses 1 to 4 agreed to. Clause 5 under consideration. Part 1 of 2 records.
Secondary information
- Type
- Parliamentary proceeding
- Reference
- 692 c884-958
- Session
- 2006-07
- Legislative stage
- Committee stage
- Procedure
- New clauses
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Related items
-
Pensions Bill. Brought from the Commons. Explanatory Notes HL Bill 61-EN also published.
Thursday, 19 April 2007
Bills
House of Lords
- Proceeding contributions
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c928-9 (Link to this contribution) I thank noble Lords who have contributed to this debate, but I urge the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, not...
-
Lord Fowler | 692 c927-8 (Link to this contribution) It makes almost no difference to the point that I was going to make. Having become a grandfather for...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c930 (Link to this contribution) No. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
-
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 692 c930 (Link to this contribution) No, we did Amendment No. 11. The noble Lord spoke to Amendment No. 13 but he moved Amendment No. 12....
-
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 692 c931-2 (Link to this contribution) I am very happy to respond to Amendment No. 13. Noble Lords will already be aware that home respons...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c931 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 13: 13: After Clause 3, insert the following new Clause— ““Allocation of child...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c930 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 12: 12: After Clause 3, insert the following new Clause— ““Report on contribut...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c929-30 (Link to this contribution) I am extremely grateful to my noble friend Lord Fowler for his speech in response to my amendment. I...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c930 (Link to this contribution) We have already done Amendment No. 12.
-
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 692 c930 (Link to this contribution) I think I am replying to Amendment No. 13. Is that correct? I will come back to Amendment No. 12.
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c932-4 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 14: 14: Clause 5, page 5, line 33, at end insert ““including those claimed by ...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c932 (Link to this contribution) I shall certainly withdraw it. I was extremely interested in the further information that the Minist...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c910 (Link to this contribution) It seems to me that we are departing from a principle with which I thought we all agreed: namely, th...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c909 (Link to this contribution) That may be right. The current system, which we are about to change, is very male-oriented. My noble...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c910-1 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 7: 7: Clause 3, page 3, leave out lines 26 to 31 The noble Lord said: We move...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c910 (Link to this contribution) The problem is that the contributory principle is based on a Beveridge-type principle, which, given ...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c908-9 (Link to this contribution) I shall withdraw the amendment but I still do not understand why payments have to be expeditious. Ap...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c909 (Link to this contribution) Under the current system, if someone has been in employment for a number of years or, if working abr...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c909 (Link to this contribution) As we are in Committee, perhaps I may ask a question. I have listened to the debate and, in particul...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c908 (Link to this contribution) I will try to help my noble friend. The issue of timing is important. People who are employed pay na...
-
Lord Fowler | 692 c908 (Link to this contribution) I am not sure whose speech I am interrupting but would the Minister have the same objection if, inst...
-
Baroness Howe of Idlicote | 692 c918 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment, not with reluctance but because it is crucially important to face this issu...
-
Baroness Greengross | 692 c918 (Link to this contribution) I speak as chair of the All-Party Group on Grandparents and Extended Kin. I agree completely with th...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c917-8 (Link to this contribution) I pay tribute to the West Norfolk Women and Carers’ Pension Network, part of the Equal Opportunity C...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c915 (Link to this contribution) I, for one, never intended to press my amendment, but I think that there will be universal approval ...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c915-7 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 9: 9: Clause 3, page 4, line 17, at end insert— ““23B Contributions credits fo...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c912 (Link to this contribution) My grouping list includes Amendments Nos. 12 and 13 in this group. If they have been ungrouped, I st...
-
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 692 c912-5 (Link to this contribution) : I am delighted to respond positively to the debate on behalf of the Government. This is not a pers...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c912 (Link to this contribution) Are the other amendments in this group—Amendments Nos. 12 and 13—going to be moved?
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c912 (Link to this contribution) There are no other amendments in this group. We are discussing Amendments Nos. 7 and 8.
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 692 c911-2 (Link to this contribution) I shall speak to Amendment No. 8. I am fully aware that it is pushing at an open door. After Second ...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c924 (Link to this contribution) I entirely agree. My noble friend is right that if that person has had a job there will be 12 years ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c923-4 (Link to this contribution) That really is not correct. If we examine the circumstances that my noble friend describes, presumab...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c919 (Link to this contribution) I do not want to go into my family history in the same way as the noble Lord, Lord Oakeshott, but, o...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c919 (Link to this contribution) I take the point that the amendment may be inappropriately and badly drafted but it is intended to a...
-
Baroness Dean of Thornton-le-Fylde | 692 c919 (Link to this contribution) I, too, support the amendment. It was interesting to hear the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Oakes...
-
Baroness Turner of Camden | 692 c920 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment and what has been said succinctly by my noble friend in moving it. It seems ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c920-2 (Link to this contribution) I fear I am going to disappoint my noble friend yet again, but I hope I can convince her that in doi...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c922-3 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister. He is known colloquially—I think that one of his friends has said it—as the Mi...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c923 (Link to this contribution) Does my noble friend not accept that, under the 30-year rule, if somebody is a grandparent, even wit...
-
Baroness Greengross | 692 c925 (Link to this contribution) Will the Minister consider one other thing? Somewhere in the Bill could there not be a line that str...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c925 (Link to this contribution) With the force of argument that has been made, one will continue to reflect on this matter. However,...
-
Baroness Howe of Idlicote | 692 c925 (Link to this contribution) I should like to probe a tiny bit further. Clearly the Minister has addressed a lot of ways in which...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c927 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, made a brief but powerful attack on the evils of means-testing an...
-
Lord Fowler | 692 c927 (Link to this contribution) I say in parenthesis that I was quite cheerful in the debate until the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, ...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c926 (Link to this contribution) With that assurance, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amend...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c926-7 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 11: 11: After Clause 3, insert the following new Clause— ““Review of pension c...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c924 (Link to this contribution) They would be able to buy six years under the current arrangement, so that is another six years of e...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 692 c897 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that reply, and others who have spoken in this short debate. It should be p...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c895-7 (Link to this contribution) This group of amendments concerns the payment of extra national insurance contributions after state ...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c894 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may help the noble Lord. I presume that he supports raising the basic state pension retire...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c898 (Link to this contribution) That is not necessarily the case; it is only if the individual wishes to continue to contribute. Tha...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c898-9 (Link to this contribution) I suspect that in that case, if we are assuming a retirement age of 60, a deficiency notice would be...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c897 (Link to this contribution) Of course the department will keep all these matters under review, but the key purpose of the Bill i...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c898 (Link to this contribution) On AmendmentNo. 3, my noble friend made a fair point that I need to reflect on about carers and the ...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c899-902 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 4: 4: Clause 1, page 2, line 32, at end insert— ““(5) The contributor may make...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 692 c902-3 (Link to this contribution) We strongly support this amendment, which, as the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, said, allows greater ...
-
Baroness Howe of Idlicote | 692 c903 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment. I have listened with considerable interest to all the reasons why some of t...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c903 (Link to this contribution) I am afraid that I am not persuaded by the eloquence of the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis. I noted fir...
-
Baroness Greengross | 692 c903 (Link to this contribution) I add my support to the amendment. As the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, made clear in introducing it,...
-
Lord Fowler | 692 c904 (Link to this contribution) I have listened to the debate and—I had better say this cautiously—found myself very much persuaded ...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c904 (Link to this contribution) As I say, although I tabled the Question several weeks ago, I picked up the Answer only today, so I ...
-
Baroness Dean of Thornton-le-Fylde | 692 c905 (Link to this contribution) My name is added to the amendment. I can think of no reason why I should not have added my name to i...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c905-7 (Link to this contribution) I thank my noble friend for raising this important issue and for the debate that has taken place. Sh...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c907 (Link to this contribution) Given the figures that have emerged today regarding the net additional cost of the gap between the p...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c907 (Link to this contribution) I do not have those figures to hand, but will certainly provide them to my noble friend. I was about...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c907-8 (Link to this contribution) I thank my noble friend for the detail of his reply, which I will work on. He made two points—one on...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 692 c891-2 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 2: 2: Clause 1, page 2, line 32, at end insert— ““(5) Should the contributor h...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c892-3 (Link to this contribution) I support Amendment No. 2 and will speak to Amendment No. 3. Both seek to address the problem of peo...
-
Baroness Turner of Camden | 692 c893-4 (Link to this contribution) I support these amendments and wish to draw attention to the briefing that I have received from the ...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c894 (Link to this contribution) I have some sympathy with the amendments in this group, but many of the arguments of the noble Baron...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c890-1 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for his reply and those who have spoken with varying degrees of sympathy on our...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c891 (Link to this contribution) Both are true. It is not affordable, and, even if it were, it would not be practical to do it at the...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c891 (Link to this contribution) As a matter of policy, if the Government are not prepared to spend the money on it they should say s...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c891 (Link to this contribution) From recollection—I will check my notes—I thought that it ran through to something like 2030, but I ...
-
Baroness Greengross | 692 c891 (Link to this contribution) I took quite a lot of encouragement from the Minister, because he responded quite warmly to my sugge...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c891 (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c887-90 (Link to this contribution) I very much welcome the opportunity in Committee to debate the detail ofa Bill that has been widely ...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c890 (Link to this contribution) Before the noble Lord, Load Oakeshott, and the noble Baroness decide whether to pursue this matter, ...
-
Baroness Greengross | 692 c885-6 (Link to this contribution) I speak to my Amendment No. 5. The provision for gender impact assessments under the public duty to ...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c886-7 (Link to this contribution) My amendment in this group is intended to explore the extent of the analysis relating to the decisio...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c890 (Link to this contribution) The point is noted. I will ensure that my notes are correspondingly changed.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c884 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do now resolve itself into Committee on this Bill. Moved acc...
-
Baroness Turner of Camden | 692 c934 (Link to this contribution) I too ask my noble friends on the Front Bench to consider this matter sympathetically. It is not the...
-
Baroness Miller of Hendon | 692 c939-42 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 15: 15: Clause 5, page 5, line 39, leave out from ““Where”” to ““shall”” in li...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c938-9 (Link to this contribution) I thank all noble Lords who have spoken. Everyone has strongly supported the amendment apart from th...
-
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 692 c936-8 (Link to this contribution) This is my first run at this debate and I very much hope that I shall not be thought of as yet anoth...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c936 (Link to this contribution) We have had this debate just about every year since I re-involved myself in what I still, rather old...
-
Lord Jones of Cheltenham | 692 c935-6 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment and wish that my noble friend and, indeed, the Minister would go further. I ...
-
Lord Dearing | 692 c934-5 (Link to this contribution) I, too, strongly support the amendment. It is some years since I raised this issue on behalf of some...
-
Baroness Greengross | 692 c934 (Link to this contribution) I too strongly support the amendment. Over many years I have met people who represent pensioners abr...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c943-4 (Link to this contribution) I would back the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, against a sore throat any time. We on these Benches su...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c942-3 (Link to this contribution) I added my name to my noble friend’s amendment because I support it. The Bill gives the Secretary of...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c944-9 (Link to this contribution) I thank all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. I say to the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, th...
-
Baroness Howe of Idlicote | 692 c944 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment. During my Second Reading speech, I drew attention to the importance of the ...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c949 (Link to this contribution) had given notice of his intention to move Amendment No. 17: 17: Clause 5, page 6, line 3, at end i...
-
Baroness Miller of Hendon | 692 c949 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for his very detailed answer. It was so detailed that I shall need to read it v...
-
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope | 692 c952-3 (Link to this contribution) Provoked by the noble Baroness, I am happily willing to support these amendments. The noble Baroness...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c956 (Link to this contribution) My noble friend made a powerful point about the sum of £4 a week frozen since 1988. Can the Minister...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c953-6 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful again to my noble friend Lady Hollis for tabling an amendment which enables us to disc...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c956 (Link to this contribution) I shall be happy to do that. However, I recall from our debate on benefits uprating a few months ago...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c957-8 (Link to this contribution) Effectively, it would arise from the latter circumstance. The proposition that there is no one in th...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c957 (Link to this contribution) Can my noble friend say what those costs would be? For instance, someone who may have the opportunit...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c957 (Link to this contribution) My noble friend presses an interesting point. I have not seen any particular figures and neither has...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c956-7 (Link to this contribution) We are talking about the cold weather payment. I am grateful to my noble friend for his careful repl...
-
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 692 c958 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move that the House do now resume. In moving the Motion, I suggest that the Committee stage...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c958 (Link to this contribution) I am sure that there is at least one retired clergyman who would declare it, but my noble friend mus...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c950-2 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 20: 20: Clause 5, page 6, line 40, at end insert— ““150B Annual up-rating of e...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c924-5 (Link to this contribution) Yes, but the point is that they may start caring at 50; they would hope to finish at 55, but their d...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 692 c884-5 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 1: 1: Clause 1, page 1, line 13, leave out ““2010”” and insert ““2008”” The n...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 692 c894 (Link to this contribution) The difference is that the first has been costed and the second—so far as I know, but I am sure the ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 692 c908 (Link to this contribution) If the noble Lord is asking whether the Government would support the idea of being able to pay nine ...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 692 c923 (Link to this contribution) My noble friend is absolutely right that the 30-year rule would help, but he is assuming that only o...
- Subjects
- Disability Children Child benefit Carers Age Women Eligibility Earnings rules Guaranteed minimum pensions Grandparents Pension credit Pensioners Personal savings Pay Pensions National insurance contributions Means-tested benefits Pension rights Overseas residence State retirement pensions Young people Take-up Retirement Voluntary contributions State second pension Home responsibilities protection
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Show all contributions (114)
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-02-08 18:01:18 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_63972
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_63972
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_63972