Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 June 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
I thank the noble Baroness for that clarification. She said that it was good business practice to give directions to a deputy chairman. I can tell her that it is 100 per cent not good business practice. It is nowhere close to normal, let alone good, business practice. It is extremely unusual that a deputy needs to receive special instructions because the nature of the deputy role is as decided. It could be straightforward deputising—that is, filling in when the chairman is not there—or it could be to undertake specific functions. ““Directions”” is a very Whitehall-centric view of how appointments to boards should be handled. If any instruction or guidance is to be given, it should come from the authority, which is what my amendment seeks. I shall reflect on what the noble Baroness has said and may return to this on Report. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 692 c1225-6
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Age Annuities Women Equality Health Investment Industrial diseases Financial assistance scheme Membership Workplace pensions Pensions Pension funds Pension Protection Fund Pension rights Retirement Life expectancy Personal Accounts Delivery Authority
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:39:19 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_401331
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_401331
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_401331