Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Gove (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 14 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Rating (Empty Properties) Bill.


Rating (Empty Properties) Bill

That is merely a variation of the argument that the Minister powerfully deployed against amendments Nos. 2, 3 and 4, which is that planning would be used as an anti-avoidance measure. We contend that no one would willingly go through the planning system unless they had to, given the system’s scale, complexity and cost, notwithstanding the changes that the Government will try to make—in good faith, I am sure—to planning legislation. Given that the amendments will provide some protection to those who honestly make changes to empty property to the benefit of the wider economy, we stand by them. Question put, That the amendment be made:— The Committee divided: Ayes 134, Noes 236.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
461 c938 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Clubs Charities Ancient monuments Building alterations Cemeteries Brownfield sites Archaeological sites Community centres Bombs Electricity generation Empty property Exemptions Farms Industry Insolvency Land use Floods Fires Planning permission Local government finance Rates and rating Business rates Listed buildings Microgeneration Small businesses Tax allowances Sports Tenants Rents Regeneration Vandalism Local Government Finance Funding Changes Independent Inquiry Land Use Planning Review
Legislation
Rating (Empty Properties) Bill 2006-07
Non-domestic Rating (Unoccupied Property) Regulations 1989
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk