Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Geoffrey Clifton-Brown (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 5 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [Lords].


Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [Lords]

I thank the Minister for accepting the principle that my hon. Friend the Member for Hertford and Stortford (Mr. Prisk) put across in Committee and for tabling the Government amendment, which incorporates what was discussed there. The new NCC must be independent, and it was important to seek from the Government an assurance that there are satisfactory management and audit oversight provisions to ensure that public money is well spent. I am sure that the Minister agrees with that. The power in the original clause was wide, and there was concern over the lack of a specific mechanism to prevent the NCC from incurring significant losses on a particular business venture. We have seen that with certain educational institutions that go out into business ventures abroad. Specifically, the amendment ensures that the reasons behind any consent given by the Secretary of State will be in the public domain, thus ensuring accountability and transparency. Again, I thank the Minister for tabling it. Amendment agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
462 c1143 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Disclosure of information Consumers Commercial secrets Licensing Energy supply Estate agents Gas and Electricity Consumer Council Qualifications Protection Postal services National Consumer Council Standards Training Regulation Consumer Council for Postal Services
Legislation
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk