Proceeding contribution from David Howarth (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 July 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on National Security.
National Security
What is being offered as an alternative to the Prime Minister’s proposal on 28 days is not just one thing, as he said, but a combination of at least three things: post-charge questioning, wire-tap evidence, and changing the prosecutors’ code to allow earlier charging. Why does he reject that combination of three things in favour of his proposal, which to all intents and purposes is internment?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 463 c860
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Biometrics Bail Detainees Broadcasting Deportation Software Citizenship Borders Finance Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Identity cards Emergency powers Foreign nationals EU action Intelligence and Security Committee Identification of criminals National security Prisoners Passengers Proof of identity Terrorism Screening Security Travel restrictions Television Visas BBC World Service Iran Rendition al Qaeda INTERPOL Joint Intelligence Committee Overseas broadcasting National Security Committee Arabic
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:24:23 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414285
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414285
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414285