Proceeding contribution from Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on Government: Draft Legislative Programme.
Government: Draft Legislative Programme
My Lords, I am extremely grateful to my noble friend for giving way. Do the Government accept that the touchstone for constitutional reform should be that the proposals are likely to improve the performance of our institutions of government? Thus, in the case of proposed reforms of either House of Parliament, would the reform in question be likely to improve the capacity of Parliament knowledgeably to debate the great issues of concern to our nation, to scrutinise legislation rigorously and in detail and powerfully to hold the Government to account? Does he accept that those are the tests and that sloganising about modernisation or democracy is beside the point?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 694 c918
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Children in care Armed conflict Central government Arts Civil service Attorney General Coroners British constitution Housing Finance Education House of Lords Judiciary Environment protection House of Lords composition EU reform Legislative drafting Public appointments Political parties Parliamentary scrutiny Parliament Non-departmental public bodies Sentencing Terrorism Treaties Reform Seas and oceans Government bills Grievance procedures
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:25:29 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414877
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414877
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414877