Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Robert Neill (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 11 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Greater London Authority Bill.


Greater London Authority Bill

I shall make a little progress before I indulge the hon. Gentleman. It is important that the system is transparent to electors. The average elector thinks the current system is manifestly absurd. The last two of the Mayor's budgets were passed having lost 16 to nine in the assembly. If we asked any citizen of the UK where someone could lose 16 to nine and still win, the answer would be that the only place that could happen would be city hall and the only person who could do it would be the Mayor of London, who had much enjoyment sitting in the gallery shouting, ““Passed””, every time the assembly defeated one of his propositions. That is the type of jiggery-pokery that brings politics into contempt and disrepute. People see their elected representatives in the assembly, who have as good a mandate as the Mayor, in effect, emasculated. That is not healthy or sensible governance.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
464 c492 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disadvantaged Candidates Climate change Housing Health Elections Eligibility Greater London Energy Greater London Authority Planning permission Local government finance Public appointments Public expenditure Recycling Mayor of London Local government executive Waste management Carbon emissions London Assembly Political systems
Legislation
Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk