Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [Lords].


Serious Crime Bill [Lords] [Ways and Means]

This proposal, relating to the establishment of new monitors under serious crime prevention orders contemplated in the Bill, is a late addition. I note what the Minister has said about the necessity for the monitors, but that is a matter for our debate on the substantive elements of the Bill and on the way in which the Government have tabled the amendments to it. It is surprising that the Government are tabling such amendments at this late stage, especially as the Bill has already been scrutinised in the other place. It raises concerns about the extent to which the provisions have been examined, but we will debate that in greater detail outside the Ways and Means resolution. We shall not oppose the resolution, but that should not be taken as our acceptance of, or acquiescence in, the general arguments on the creation of monitors arising from serious crime prevention orders. Question agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
465 c41 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Crime prevention Appeals Crime Companies Crimes of violence Costs Assets Recovery Agency Computers Finance Firearms Incitement Ethnic groups Police Organised crime Proceeds of crime Offensive weapons Monitoring Terrorism Stop and search Surveillance Revenue and Customs Serious Organised Crime Agency Serious crime prevention orders
Legislation
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk