Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [Lords].
Serious Crime Bill [Lords]
The Minister has talked about the application of the orders and the way in which they would need to be monitored, and I understand his point about the complexity of corporate structures and how businesses might be used. Will he explain, however, whether the orders will require the recipient to have knowledge that they have committed or been involved in a serious crime? There could be a risk that someone unknowingly involved in such a crime could be the subject of an order and have to pay the cost of the monitoring.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 465 c44
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Crime prevention Appeals Crime Companies Crimes of violence Costs Assets Recovery Agency Computers Finance Firearms Incitement Ethnic groups Police Organised crime Proceeds of crime Offensive weapons Monitoring Terrorism Stop and search Surveillance Revenue and Customs Serious Organised Crime Agency Serious crime prevention orders
- Legislation
- Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
- Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:02:41 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418807
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418807
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418807