Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Coaker (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [Lords].


Serious Crime Bill [Lords]

I am grateful to the hon. Member for Hornchurch (James Brokenshire) for recognising the complexity of the Bill and for, quite frankly, the decent way in which he admitted that fact. Some of these provisions are very technical, complex and difficult. That is the reason, frankly, why some of these amendments are being debated on the Floor of the House. I make no apology, however, for introducing something that will significantly improve the Bill. It would be somewhat ridiculous if, because I might be embarrassed about the fact that the hon. Gentleman would complain about such late additions to the Bill, I did not introduce amendments that improve it and make a significant difference to it. All I can say to the hon. Gentleman is that I apologise for the late introduction of new clause 1 and to the House for the lateness of some of the amendments, but I do not apologise for the fact that provisions, such as new clause 1, will make a significant difference and are significant improvements to the Bill, and it is therefore important that we debate them today.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
465 c50 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Crime prevention Appeals Crime Companies Crimes of violence Costs Assets Recovery Agency Computers Finance Firearms Incitement Ethnic groups Police Organised crime Proceeds of crime Offensive weapons Monitoring Terrorism Stop and search Surveillance Revenue and Customs Serious Organised Crime Agency Serious crime prevention orders
Legislation
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk