Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Alan Johnson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 26 November 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

I cannot say whether we have consulted the judges; all I can say is that eight of the current regulatory bodies operate in accordance with the procedure that I have set out. Our consultation suggested that there was wide-ranging support, including, incidentally, from the GMC—the recommendation stemmed from Dame Janet Smith's inquiry into Shipman—which believes that there should be a change from the criminal standard. The other argument, which is probably the clincher, is that if a case against an individual doctor was that serious, the criminal benchmark would apply. For all those reasons, the proposal has a widespread consensus behind it. I cannot say whether that consensus stretches right through the legal profession, but we have a strong enough argument to proceed on that basis.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
468 c42 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Care homes Coroners Doctors General Medical Council Health services Finance Health professions Disease control Grants Hygiene NHS Patients Public appointments Pharmacy Public participation Mental health services Psychiatry Obesity Mental Health Act Commission Pregnancy Scotland Registration Waiting lists Standards Regulation Social services Telephone services Healthcare Commission Commission for Social Care Inspection Patients' forums Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence General Optical Council Nursing and Midwifery Council Care Quality Commission
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk