Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 December 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on European Council: 14 December 2007.
European Council: 14 December 2007
My Lords, is not the attack of the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde, on the Prime Minister totally predictable? Does it not underline the complete bankruptcy of the Conservative Opposition on anything to do with Europe? If the Prime Minister had attended the signing of the treaty, would he not have been accused of putting the interests of the EU before those of the UK? Equally, if he had not attended the committee, would he not have been pilloried for having ignored the requirements of Parliament? In other words, he could not do right according to the Opposition. As it is—and I hope that my noble friend will agree—the Prime Minister should be congratulated on rather than condemned for what he did.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 697 c498
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Climate change Human rights European Union EU internal trade Financial markets EU action EU external trade EU economic policy EU institutions EU reform Nuclear fuels Peacekeeping operations Politics and government Terrorism Sovereignty Treaties Myanmar Kosovo European Council Iran
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:00:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430607
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430607
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430607