Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 29 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill
I understand that, but it was always intended that there should be a chairman and a chief executive, so from most practical points of view—I think I am right in understanding this from what the Minister has said—there is no difference. I understand that there is difference in the treatment of VAT, which he has just mentioned, and in employment law, but beyond that I cannot see that there is really very much difference. Have I still got it wrong?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c296GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Child support Children Conditions of employment Debts Age Absent parents Child Support Agency ICT Maintenance Parents Staff Standards Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
- Legislation
- Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:29:20 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440013
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440013
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440013