Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 13 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Employment Bill [HL].
Employment Bill [HL]
This is very important. As the Minister knows, the Revenue already has pretty extensive powers. I remember when with other colleagues I was taking the Child Support Act—dare I mention it?—through the House many years ago, and we tried to give similar powers to child support officers as the Revenue already had. It was pointed out that those powers were very excessive indeed, but historically that the Revenue and Customs had always had those powers. The noble Lord is trying to extend the powers that the Revenue has in terms of entering properties without magistrates’ consent, and all that. Would not existing powers that, for example, the Inland Revenue used to have, which were slightly less than those the Customs and Excise had, be more appropriate?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 699 c263GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Criminal investigation Employment Fees and charges Enforcement Fines Employment agencies Powers Membership Minimum wage Political parties Temporary employment Trade unions Shipping Unemployed people Voluntary work Revenue and Customs
- Legislation
- Employment Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:36:41 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454817
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454817
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454817