Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andrew Dismore (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 9 May 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning and Energy Bill.


Planning and Energy Bill

I thank my hon. Friend; my right hon. Friend's constituency is Kingston upon Hull, East (Mr. Prescott). He set companies the challenge of building a £60,000 house that would meet eco-standards. A German company was able to do it by making all the parts of the house in a factory and putting them together on site. Apparently, that is called an MMU. I do not know what MMU stands for. [Interruption.] I think the first letter stands for ““modular”” and the last for ““unit””. Of course, the suggestion is that prices will drop as demand increases. As we have mentioned, an energy-efficient house works out rather cheaper in the long term. The Government are now encouraging that modern method of construction, or MMC—an MMU must be a ““modern method unit””—which they think can achieve a step-change in the construction industry. That method involves prefabricating houses in factories. The potential benefits are faster construction, fewer defects and reductions in energy use and waste—or so it is claimed. Hon. Members may be aware of the old prefabs that were put up after the second world war to meet the housing crisis; they were far from being any of those desirable things.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
475 c997-8 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Conservation Construction Climate change Energy Insulation Heating Planning permission Planning Public participation Microgeneration Standards Renewable energy Carbon emissions
Legislation
Planning and Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk