Proceeding contribution from Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 May 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on European Union (Amendment) Bill.
European Union (Amendment) Bill
It is not different in kind if we have accepted it as an international obligation. It is different in kind in the period before we accept it. In the period before we accept it as an international obligation, it is up to us. We can veto it, or not join the organisation, as the French did not join the International Energy Agency at the outset, although they have now joined it. We can do that, but once we have joined, and jointly taken a decision to share our oil stocks, I do not notice any difference whatever, except that the method of making decisions about those stocks is different. The obligation is the same. It is a binding international obligation on the British Government.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 701 c1032
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Administration of justice Audit Accountancy Biofuels EU law Energy European Union Legislation Fuels EU budget Natural gas Sovereignty Renewable energy European Court of Justice Qualified majority voting Treaty of Lisbon EU energy policy European Court of Auditors
- Legislation
- European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:18:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_472757
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_472757
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_472757