Proceeding contribution from Baroness Byford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 3 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.
Housing and Regeneration Bill
Would the Minister like to reflect on his earlier comment when he said that this is a ““digression””? I do not think he meant to say those words, but they were unfortunate when we are dealing with the small but very important question of provision for rural communities. I would hate this to go by without that being rectified, because those of us in rural areas have a feeling that that is what is likely to follow.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c14GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Community development Compulsory purchase Common land Brownfield sites Housing Land Leisure Infrastructure Land use Gardens Facilities Floods Local government Powers Property transfer Planning Property development Prices Transport Roads Regeneration Greenfield sites Eco-towns
- Legislation
- Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:27:19 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_476232
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_476232
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_476232