Proceeding contribution from Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 3 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.
Housing and Regeneration Bill
My general understanding is that if a compulsory purchase order is used to buy land that is designated common land or, perish the thought, the noble Lord’s village green in Great Bentley, part of the terms and conditions of the purchase would be that additional land would have to be acquired to replace what was being taken over for some other use. I would like an assurance that that will continue to be the case.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c49GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Community development Compulsory purchase Common land Brownfield sites Housing Land Leisure Infrastructure Land use Gardens Facilities Floods Local government Powers Property transfer Planning Property development Prices Transport Roads Regeneration Greenfield sites Eco-towns
- Legislation
- Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:36:27 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_476283
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_476283
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_476283