Proceeding contribution from David Davis (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism Bill.
Counter-Terrorism Bill
Innocent. That demonstrates—[Interruption.] We can reiterate the argument that we had last time. The last time I used ““innocent””, Labour Members exploded in uproar at the idea that those people might be innocent, so I told Labour Members that I had asked the police at the time whether they were concerned sufficiently to put those three people under control orders. ““No,”” they said. I asked whether they were sufficiently concerned to put them under overt or covert surveillance? ““No,”” they said. I asked whether they were carrying on any further investigations into them? ““No,”” they said. I give way to the ex-Home Secretary.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 477 c330
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Civil liberties Crime prevention Criminal investigation Bail Administration of justice Detainees Evidence Police Parliamentary scrutiny Terrorism Security Habeas corpus
- Legislation
- Counter-terrorism Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:18:30 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480596
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480596
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480596