Proceeding contribution from Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism Bill.
Counter-Terrorism Bill
The hon. Gentleman says that he believes that hon. Members would be ingenious enough to handle the scrutiny requirements placed on us, but what do we do when constituents come to us for help with family members detained under the proposed powers? If we are asked to use the scrutiny procedure to challenge decisions and to speak up for members of our communities, what should we say—to our constituents, our colleagues in this Chamber and to the Government? How can we make the parliamentary scrutiny meaningful?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 477 c376
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Civil liberties Crime prevention Criminal investigation Bail Administration of justice Detainees Evidence Police Parliamentary scrutiny Terrorism Security Habeas corpus
- Legislation
- Counter-terrorism Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:20:07 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480817
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480817
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480817