---

Counter-Terrorism Bill

I explained earlier the type of grave and exceptional threat that would be necessary, and I have explained how Parliament could test that. I hope that hon. Members will agree that in this House we should always rely on force of argument and the rule of law to counter terror. Today hon. Members have heard the arguments, and we have all now to make a decision on the protections that we need to ensure that the rule of law continues to run. The British people place their trust in us to take the right decisions to protect them. I cannot and will not wish away the threat from those whose aim and sole intent is to blow up our citizens, of all races and religions, on our streets. When it comes to dealing with terrorism, my view is straightforward. We cannot simply hope for the best. We must have plans in place that mean that we can cope with the worst. The question that everybody needs to answer is whether they are confident that no police investigation would ever need to hold somebody for longer than 28 days. I greatly prize consensus. It has motivated me in bringing these proposals. However, important as consensus is, I prize the interests of Britain's security above it. We should do the right thing to protect our people, and that is what I am asking the House to support me in this evening. It being Six o'clock, Mr. Speaker put forthwith the Question already proposed from the Chair, pursuant to Orders [1 April and 10 June]. Question put and agreed to. Clause read a Second time, and added to the Bill. Mr. Speaker then put forthwith the Questions necessary for the disposal of the business to be concluded at that hour.