Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 19 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

The noble Lord, Lord O’Neill, reminded me of a point which I found interesting while doing the background research and being the subject of lobbying. As a subject, I find co-firing extremely interesting, but of course there are only three power stations in the country that are available for co-firing at present—or which have built the upgrades to deal with it. I believe that it is Drax and two stations owned by British Energy. A lot of the work done on the banding of co-firing was based on a consultation process. Is the Minister happy with the fact that the majority of respondents to the consultation process are those companies in direct competition with those companies dealing with co-firing and, therefore, their view might be slightly slanted on how they looked at co-firing? The consultation document might read in a different way because most of the companies responding are not involved in co-firing themselves.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c453GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Devolved matters Costs Biofuels Energy Electricity generation Electricity Grants Electric cables Northern Ireland Power stations Microgeneration Offshore industry Scotland Schools Wales Renewable energy Technology Research Wind power Territorial waters Carbon emissions Geothermal power Renewables obligation Drax Power
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk