Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Crossrail Bill.
Crossrail Bill
I am a bit concerned about the Minister’s answer. It was technical, of course, but I think he said that there should be a single infrastructure manager. Everyone—certainly the Select Committee—thinks that that would be beneficial. However, his answer did not seem to indicate that there is a way through it. As everyone thinks it is desirable, particularly for the tunnel section, we should find a way to do it. I understand the points the Minister made, but he did not give a solution. I hope someone can find a solution to this problem because that is what we ought to try to do.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c679GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Access Disclosure of information Construction Arbitration Cooperation Annual reports Elizabeth line Crossrail Delegated legislation Land Greater London EU law Infrastructure Exemptions High speed trains Public appointments Property transfer Railway stations Railway network Network Rail Public private partnerships Reading (Berkshire) Regulation Safety Repairs and maintenance Underground railways Transport for London Tunnels Civil engineering Travel information Henry VIII clauses Maidenhead Office of Rail Regulation
- Legislation
- Crossrail Bill 2004/05 to 2005-06 to 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-09-19 11:26:56 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487413
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487413
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487413