Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Crossrail Bill.


Crossrail Bill

I support this amendment. I am not sure that this section of the Railways Act—I do not have a copy of it with me—applies to some of the things that the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield, spoke about, but he is right, and I just wish this amendment could apply to the whole network, but that is probably beyond the scope of the Bill. As the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, said, it is essential that the industry processes, which require this kind of notice, are adhered to. If Network Rail is to be the infrastructure manager of the surface section, as we all believe, it is up to the regulator, through the industry process, I think, to make sure that this happens. No doubt my noble friend will be putting enormous pressure on everyone to make sure that it does happen because it is an important point.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c698-9GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Disclosure of information Construction Arbitration Cooperation Annual reports Elizabeth line Crossrail Delegated legislation Land Greater London EU law Infrastructure Exemptions High speed trains Public appointments Property transfer Railway stations Railway network Network Rail Public private partnerships Reading (Berkshire) Regulation Safety Repairs and maintenance Underground railways Transport for London Tunnels Civil engineering Travel information Henry VIII clauses Maidenhead Office of Rail Regulation
Legislation
Crossrail Bill 2004/05 to 2005-06 to 2006-07 to 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk