Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Crossrail Bill.

Crossrail Bill

I know that the arbiter for the PPP is a different name and has different functions from the ORR, but when it comes to appeals or arbitration, they are effectively the same. He is called an arbiter for the PPP, and there is the regulator, but we are not talking about all the other duties. It is purely arbitration. There are enormous similarities, and the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, has made the point succinctly. On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 40, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 41 to 45 agreed to. [Amendments Nos. 21 and 22 not moved.] Schedule 11 agreed to. Clause 46 agreed to. Schedule 12 [Transfer schemes]:

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c704GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Disclosure of information Construction Arbitration Cooperation Annual reports Elizabeth line Crossrail Delegated legislation Land Greater London EU law Infrastructure Exemptions High speed trains Public appointments Property transfer Railway stations Railway network Network Rail Public private partnerships Reading (Berkshire) Regulation Safety Repairs and maintenance Underground railways Transport for London Tunnels Civil engineering Travel information Henry VIII clauses Maidenhead Office of Rail Regulation
Legislation
Crossrail Bill 2004/05 to 2005-06 to 2006-07 to 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk