Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

Precisely for that reason—taxation, as noble Lords know, is an issue not for this House but for the other place. The proposition was not acceptable to the other place; that is why it claimed financial privilege. We cannot debate sensibly a pensions issue of this nature without understanding the full range of taxation implications. My noble friend would not support one proposition at all if it did not involve full withdrawal; alternatively secured pensions—the money left in the pot when someone dies—involve a 70 per cent tax charge and the rest flows through for inheritance tax. Is that in the minds of noble Lords who support the proposition? The noble Lord asked about ISAs. You do not get a tax deduction on the way into an ISA; you may get tax-free income.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c1014-5 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Companies Annuities Competition Administrative delays Equality Health Eligibility Gender Income tax Divorce Insolvency Discrimination Financial assistance scheme Index linking Private sector Workplace pensions Pensions Lump sum payments Pension Protection Fund PAYE Scotland State retirement pensions Regulation Taxation Retirement State earnings related pension scheme Pensions Regulator Private equity Civil partnerships dissolution State second pension Impact assessments
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk